Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous release of A3 pulley of the fifth finger to treat trigger finger: Description of the technique, with reference to a specific case.

Trigger finger causes pain and a persistent functional limitation of the hand, which can lead to permanent blockage of the flexor tendon. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous release has been widely reported as a successful technique for trigger finger involving the A1 pulley. This article describes for the first time the use of this technique in an unusual location, the A3 pulley of the fifth finger. A 71-year-old patient presented with a 3-month history of pain and blockage in the fifth finger of the right hand and was diagnosed with a grade III trigger finger, according to the Froimson scale. We performed an ultrasonography-guided percutaneous release technique on the A3 pulley to release the flexor tendon of the fifth finger. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous polectomy to treat trigger finger in the A1 pulley is an effective alternative treatment to surgery and even has certain advantages over it. The anatomical similarity between the A1 and A3 pulleys was the key factor that supported the use of this technique in this clinical case. Based on past experience in similar cases, we conclude that ultrasonography-guided percutaneous polectomy of the A3 pulley of the fifth finger was a surgical technique which could lead to a satisfactory outcome in the treatment of this condition.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Tendon Release for Trigger Finger Compared With Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger (also known as stenosing tenosynovitis) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects the fingers and causes discomfort and functional impairment. It is estimated to affect 2-3.6% of the population and is more common in manual laborers and individuals engaged in repetitive hand activities. This study comprehensively compares the efficacy of ultrasound-guided release versus traditional open surgery in treating trigger fingers. MATERIALS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies evaluating ultrasound-guided release of trigger finger (grade 2 and higher) compared with open surgical release. A meta-analysis was performed by Revman software 5.4.1 to assess efficacy, utilizing appropriate statistical methods to address heterogeneity. Primary outcome measures included "Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (QDASH) scores, Grip strength, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included Days of stopping analgesia, full-digit flexion and extension, days to return to normal activities, pinch strength, Quinnell grading score, and bow strengthening. RESULTS: Out of the initial pool of 820 studies, five met the inclusion criteria, including 275 patients with 283 trigger digits. The analysis revealed significant differences favoring the ultrasound-guided release group over the surgical group for improvement in Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the first month (MD -0.48, 95% CI: 0.75 to -0.2, P = .0007, I2 = 20%). The difference was not statistically significant in the 3-month follow-up period (MD -2.25, 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.05, P = .1, I2 = 0%). Additionally, there is a significant difference in the days required for return to normal activities in favor of the ultrasound release approach (MD -13.78, 95% CI: -16.68 to 10.89, P = .00001, I2 = 68%). The data displayed heterogeneity, which was resolved through sensitivity analysis that also favored the ultrasound-guided group. In terms of grip strength, full-digit flexion and extension, VAS, and days of stopping analgesia no significant differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided release showed advantages over open surgical release, resulting in improved QDASH score and quicker return to normal activities. This offers a minimally invasive, successful alternative to open surgery, reducing associated risks. Further studies with long-term follow-up are recommended.

Is arthritis an associated risk factor for trigger finger occurrence after carpal tunnel release? A nationwide, population-based study in Korea.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that increased friction between the flexor tendon and surrounding structures due to hand arthritis is an important risk factor for trigger finger (TF) after carpal tunnel release (CTR). Therefore, we compared TF development according to the presence or absence of arthritis in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients treated with CTR. METHODS: This retrospective study was based on data collected from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) in the Republic of Korea between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2015. Patients diagnosed with TF between one month and one year after the CTR date or with a history of surgery were included in the study. During subsequent follow-up, the patients were divided into subgroups of those (1) with TF and (2) without TF. Sex, age, arthritis, and TF-related comorbidities were compared between the subgroups. RESULTS: The subgroup with TF had a higher proportion of women (9.43% vs 90.57%), the highest age range between 50 and 59 years, more cases of arthritis (32.55% vs 16.79%), and a higher proportion of patients with hypothyroidism (10.85% vs 4.60%) than the group without TF. The association between arthritis and TF after CTR was examined using a multivariate logistic regression model, showing arthritis to be a significant risk factor for TF after CTR (odds ratio, 1.35; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: We identified arthritis as an important risk factor for the development of TF after CTR.

Flexor Tenosynovial Fistula as a Complication after Endoscopic Trigger Finger Release: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: We report a rare case of flexor tenosynovial fistula secondary to endoscopic release of the A1 pulley for treatment of trigger finger. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old woman underwent endoscopic release of the A1 pulleys of her left ring and right middle fingers. Nine days after surgery, the wound at the base of the proximal phalanx of the ring finger (distal portal) remained open and a clear liquid discharge was seen. The volume of discharge increased with active finger motion. However, there was no evidence of infection. The patient was diagnosed with tenosynovial fistula as a complication of endoscopic release of the A1 pulley. At day 30, the fistula and drainage persisted and the condition was managed by surgical excision of the fistula and primary closure. The wound then healed completely. CONCLUSION: Our report alerts hand surgeons to the potential development of flexor tenosynovial fistula as a very rare complication following endoscopic release of the A1 pulley for the treatment of trigger finger.

Sonographically controlled minimally-invasive A1 pulley release using a new guide instrument - a case series of 106 procedures in 64 patients.

BACKGROUND: With percutaneous and minimally-invasive pulley release becoming more popular, safety and reliability of such minimally-invasive procedures remain a concern. Visualization of the technical steps by ultrasound suggests increased safety but shows the potential for harm to tendons, nerves and vessels without proper instrumentation. We present the results of implementing a sonographically guided minimally-invasive procedure in 106 trigger digits of 64 patients between 2018-2021. METHODS: A guide instrument for use with a commercially available hook knife was developed and tested in 16 cadaver hands. Due to complication early in our clinical series this guide was modified in due course. A revised design of the guide has been in use since November 2019 with improved performance and safety. RESULTS: One hundred six procedures in 64 patients were performed. After guide revision, we report a success rate of 97.3%. Complications after instrument revision include two cases of incomplete pulley release and one case of inadvertent skin laceration. The majority of patients report returning to all strenuous activities within two weeks at most apart from four individuals with prolonged postoperative discomfort. CONCLUSION: We present the results of the development and implementation of a novel guide instrument for use with a hook knife to treat trigger finger. Despite several limitations of this study, we show that sonographically controlled, minimally-invasive A1 pulley release can be performed safely and effectively with appropriate surgical instruments and practice.

[Trigger finger: to operate or to inject?] / Trigger finger: opereren of injecteren?

Trigger finger is a common hand disorder in which swelling of the affected flexor-tendon results in triggering, locking or pain at the A1-pulley and impaired function of the finger. In this clinical lesson we describe 4 cases of patients with this condition, illustrating the clinical picture of trigger finger and how decisions regarding treatment are made. In typical cases the diagnosis is straight forward, but if the clinical presentation is less clear (e.g. in case if there is only pain at the A1-pully or a locked finger) making the diagnosis can be challenging. Conservative (doing nothing, orthosis, injection) and operative treatment options are discussed. Guiding principles are formulated which may help in choosing the most appropriate treatment for individual patients.

Changes in flexor pollicis longus tendon cross-sectional dimensions after A1 pulley release for paediatric trigger thumb.

In this study, 30 patients with unilateral paediatric trigger thumb were examined with measurements taken within 1 month before surgery, and at 3 months after surgery. We measured the dorsal-palmar (DP) diameter, radioulnar (RU) diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon at two sites: just proximal to the A1 pulley and underneath the A1 pulley using ultrasonography. Following surgical A1 pulley release, the DP diameter, RU diameter and CSA of the FPL tendon just proximal to the A1 pulley significantly decreased from 2.6 mm to 2.2 mm, from 5.1 mm to 4.2 mm and from 11 mm2 to 7.8 mm2, respectively. Additionally, the RU diameter and CSA of the FPL tendon at the area beneath the A1 pulley significantly increased from 2.2 mm to 3.2 mm and from 4.3 mm2 to 5.8 mm2, respectively. This finding suggests that the conformation of the FPL tendon of the affected thumb tends to return to that of the contralateral uninvolved thumb after A1 pulley release. Underdevelopment of the inner space around the A1 pulley may contribute to the development of paediatric trigger thumb.Level of evidence: III.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous opening of the A1 pulley with surgical knife on anterograde versus retrograde approach: A comparative cadaver study (40 fingers).

OBJECTIVE: Trigger finger is one of the most common pathologies of the finger flexor mechanism. Previous studies have shown the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenolysis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous ultrasound-guided tenolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a comparative cadaver study performed between December 2021 and April 2022 in France, with 40 fresh cadaver fingers. Thumbs were excluded. A single surgeon performed 20 ultrasound-guided anterograde releases and 20 ultrasound-guided retrograde releases, using a second-generation minimally invasive surgical knife, and a multipurpose linear ultrasound transducer. The primary endpoint was the success of ultrasound-guided release, defined as complete opening of the A1 pulley along its entire length. RESULTS: The success rate was 90% in the retrograde group and 95% in the anterograde group (non-significant difference: p = 0.56). There was no significant difference in superficial flexor tendon slip injuries or partial A2 pulley injuries. There were no neurovascular pedicle lesions. CONCLUSION: The choice of anterograde or retrograde ultrasound-guided tenolysis should be left to the surgeon's discretion.

Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Excision for Trigger Finger - A Systematic Literature Review.

Background: Division of one or more slips of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon has been posited as an effective surgical modality for advanced or recurrent trigger finger. This may be an effective approach among patients with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis, or in those with fixed flexion deformities who have poor outcomes from A1 pulley release alone. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of this procedure. The role of this study was to systematically review the evidence on functional outcomes and safety of partial or complete FDS resection in the management of trigger finger. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and Ovid Medline databases were electronically queried from their inception until February 2022. English language papers were included if they reported original data on postoperative outcomes and complications following resection of one or more slips of FDS for adult trigger finger. Results: Seven articles were eligible for inclusion, encompassing 420 fingers in 290 patients. All included studies were retrospective. Isolated ulnar slip FDS resection was the most described surgery. Mean postoperative fixed flexion deformity at the proximal interphalangeal joint was 6.0° compared to 31.5° preoperatively, and the proportion of patients with fixed flexion deformity reduced by 58%. Mean postoperative total active motion was 228.7°. Recurrence was seen in 4.7% of digits, and complications occurred in 11.2% of cases. No post-surgical ulnar drift or swan neck deformities were observed. Conclusions: FDS resection for long-standing trigger finger, or in diabetic or rheumatoid populations, is an effective and safe technique with low rates of recurrence. Prospective and comparative studies of this technique would be beneficial. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Combination of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release and intra-tendon sheath injection improves the therapeutic outcomes in adult trigger finger patients.

AIM: This study aimed to use high-frequency ultrasound guidance to compare the efficacy of percutaneous release combined with intra-tendon sheath injection (PR-ITSI) and percutaneous release only (PR-ONLY) in the treatment of adult trigger finger (TF) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients were randomly divided into PR-ITSI group and PR-ONLY group. The thickness of the A1 pulley was measured prior to surgery and 1-year after surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale score of affected fingers were evaluated at 1 day, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The overall difference of VAS score between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant (p<0.001), while the VAS scores gradually decreased in both groups at different time-points after treatment. The VAS scores in the PR-ITSI group at 1 day and 1 month after surgery were 1.475 and 0.904 (p<0.001), respectively, which were lower than those in the PR-ONLY group. Different treatment methods had no effect on the VAS score at 1 year after surgery (p=0.055). The thickness of the A1 pulley at 1 year after surgery was lower than that before surgery (p<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in A1 pulley thickness between the two groups (p=0.095). The rate of PGI-I scale improvement by one grade at 1 day, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery in the PR-ITSI group was 15.322 times (95%CI: 4.466-52.573, p<0.001), 14.807 times (95%CI: 2.931-74.799, p=0.001), and 15.557 times (95%CI: 1.119-216.307, p=0.041), respectively, than that in the PR-ONLY group. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided PR-ITSI is superior to PR-ONLY in the VAS score and PGI-I scale for adult TF patients.

Prognostic factors related to recurrence of trigger finger after open surgical release in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent trigger finger after surgery is one of the major adverse events. However, studies to identify factors associated with recurrence after open surgical release in adult trigger finger patients are still limited. PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with recurrent trigger finger after open surgical release. METHODS: This 12-year retrospective observational study included 723 patients with 841 trigger fingers who underwent open A1 pulley release. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with recurrent trigger finger after surgery and those without. Associations between potential predictors including age, sex, duration of symptoms, occupation status, active smoker status, number of steroid injections before surgery, and types of comorbidities and the outcome of interest, recurrence of trigger finger, were examined using univariable and multivariable analyses. The results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The recurrence rate after trigger finger release was 2.39% (20 of 841 fingers). After adjusting for confounders, more than 3 steroid injections before surgery and manual labor were the independent predictors of recurrent trigger finger (HR = 4.87, 95%CI = 1.06-22.35 and HR = 3.43, 95%CI = 1.15-10.23, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More than 3 steroid injections before surgery and manual labor increase the risk of recurrent trigger finger after an open A1 pulley release. There may be limited benefit in administering a fourth steroid injection.

The temporal effect of corticosteroid injections into large joints prior to trigger finger release on infection.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger may be treated with open surgical release. Local corticosteroid injections have also demonstrated success. Studies suggest recipients of flexor sheath corticosteroid up to 90-days prior to open surgery are at increased risk of post-operative infection. However, the possible link between large joints corticosteroid prior to trigger finger release remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to provide complication risks for trigger finger release recipients after large joint corticosteroid. METHODS: We reviewed a national, all-payer database and examined patients who did not receive and did receive corticosteroid two, four, or six weeks prior to trigger finger release. Primary outcomes assessed were 90-day risk for antibiotics, infection, and irrigations and debridement. Multivariate logistic analyses compared cohorts using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: No trends were found regarding antibiotic requirements, infection, as well irrigations and debridement within 90-days for recipients of corticosteroid into large joints two, four, or six weeks prior to open trigger finger release. Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use were identified as independent risks for requiring antibiotics as well as irrigations and debridement (all Odds Ratios > 1.06, all p ≤ 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent trigger finger release after receiving a corticosteroid into a large joint two, four, or six weeks prior has no association with 90-day antibiotics, infection, or irrigations and debridement. While the comfort levels for individual surgeons vary, optimizing these comorbidities prior to surgery is an important goal discussed with patients to lower risks for infections. RETROSPECTIVE: Level III.

High incidence of trigger finger after carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Trigger finger (TF) often occurs after carpal tunnel release (CTR), but the mechanism and outcomes remain inconsistent. This study evaluated the incidence of TF after CTR and its related risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ​PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to 27 August 2022, with the following keywords: "carpal tunnel release" and "trigger finger". Studies with complete data on the incidence of TF after CTR and published full text. The primary outcome was the association between CTR and the subsequent occurrence of the TF and to calculate the pooled incidence of post-CTR TF. The secondary outcomes included the potential risk factors among patients with and without post-CTR TF as well as the prevalence of the post-CTR TF on the affected digits. RESULTS: Ten studies with total 10,399 participants in 9 studies and 875 operated hands in one article were included for meta-analysis. CTR significantly increases the risk of following TF occurrence (odds ratio=2.67; 95% CI 2.344-3.043; P <0.001). The pooled incidence of TF development after CTR was 7.7%. Women were more likely to develop a TF after CTR surgery (odds ratio=2.02; 95% CI 1.054-3.873; P =0.034). Finally, the thumb was the most susceptible fingers, followed by middle and ring fingers. CONCLUSIONS: High incidence of TF comes after CTR, and women were more susceptible than man. Clinicians were suggested to notice the potential risk of TF after CTR in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, meta-analysis.

[Trigger finger-pitfalls and differential diagnosis]. / Der schnellende Finger ­ Pitfalls und Differenzialdiagnostik.

The differential diagnosis of a trigger finger presents a clinical challenge. This case depicts a 32-year-old male patient who presented with persistent snapping of the right index finger at the metacarpophalangeal joint without localized tenderness despite previous surgical A1-annular ligament release. CT diagnostics demonstrated a prominent articular tuberosity. The MRI showed no pathological findings. Surgical revision with concomitant excision of the tuberosity restored smooth mobility of the index finger.

Presentation and Management of the Pediatric Trigger Finger: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Pediatric trigger finger (PTF) is an acquired condition that is uncommon and anatomically complex. Currently, the literature is characterized by a small number of retrospective case series with limited sample sizes. This investigation sought to evaluate the presentation, management, and treatment outcomes of PTF in a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of PTF between 2009 and 2020 was performed at three tertiary referral hospitals. Patient demographics, PTF characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Patients and families also were contacted by telephone to assess the downstream persistence or recurrence of triggering symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 321 patients with 449 PTFs were included at a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 4.0 years. There were approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, and the mean age of symptom onset was 5.4 ± 5.1 years. The middle (34.7%) and index (11.6%) fingers were the most and least commonly affected digits, respectively. Overall, PTFs managed operatively achieved significantly higher rates of complete resolution compared with PTFs managed nonsurgically (97.1% vs 30.0%). Seventy-five percent of PTFs that achieved complete resolution with nonsurgical management did so within 6 months, and approximately 90% did so within 12 months. Patients with multidigit involvement, higher Quinnell grade at presentation, or palpable nodularity were significantly more likely to undergo surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete resolution between splinted versus not splinted PTFs or across operative techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Only 30% of the PTFs managed nonsurgically achieved complete resolution. Splinting did not improve resolution rates in children treated nonsurgically. In contrast, surgical intervention has a high likelihood of restoring motion and function of the affected digit. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Flexor tendon degeneration affects short-term outcomes of open trigger digit release.

We aimed to investigate the association between flexor tendon degeneration and outcome of open trigger digit release. We recruited 162 trigger digits (136 patients) who had open trigger digit release from February 2017 to March 2019. Intraoperatively, six features of tendon degenerations were identified: irregular tendon surface, tendon fraying, intertendinous tear, synovial thickening, hyperaemia of sheath and tendon dryness. Longer duration of preoperative symptoms was associated with worsening tendon surface irregularity and fraying; increased number of steroid injections was associated with worsening tendon surface irregularity and dryness; higher DASH score was associated with severe tendon fraying, dryness and intertendinous tear; limited proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) motion was associated with severe tendon dryness. At 1-month post-surgery, DASH score remained high in severe intertendinous tear group while PIPJ motion remained limited in severe tendon dryness group. In conclusion, the severity of various flexor tendon degenerations influenced the outcome of open trigger digit release at 1-month but did not affect the outcome at 3- and 6-months post-surgery.

Single-Incision Endoscopic Trigger Finger Release.

Trigger finger surgery is a commonly performed open procedure with known potential complications of infection, stiffness, pain, nerve injury, bowstringing, and incomplete release of the A1 pulley. We present a novel single-incision endoscopic trigger finger release technique that moves the incision from the palm to the palmar-digital crease, leading to less pain, scarring, and stiffness. We believe that this technique is technically simple, fast, and may decrease the risk of complications commonly encountered with open trigger finger release. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia.

Trigger thumb surgery can be performed through open surgery or percutaneous release. Open surgery often requires hospitalization, an operating room, a surgical incision, and postoperative wound care; however, percutaneous release does not require hospitalization or surgery, and is relatively easier and faster. We aimed to assess the results of percutaneous A-1 pulley release using local anesthesia without hospitalization for the treatment of pediatric trigger thumb. In this retrospective study, we included patients operated on between March 2013 and August 2020 with the diagnosis of trigger thumb. The percutaneous release under local anesthesia was applied to all the children by one orthopedic surgeon. All percutaneous release procedures were performed in outpatient clinic conditions. There were 183 children (218 thumbs) who were enrolled in the clinic. Eighty-seven patients were male (47.5%) and 96 were female (52.5%). The average follow-up duration was 5 years (1-8.5 years). Among the 218 trigger thumb cases, 211 were satisfactory (successful result rate 96.8%). Relapse was seen in only 3 thumbs in the early postoperative period. No patient experienced neurovascular deficit or infection. The percutaneous surgical release in pediatric trigger thumb treatment is a simple, minimally invasive procedure that can be done in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia. In addition, the procedure duration is short and has minimal complication rates and maximum patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence III.

National Benchmarks for the Efficacy of Trigger Finger and the Risk Factors Associated With Failure.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and multiple corticosteroid injections used for symptomatic trigger finger. The rates of subsequent injections and the rate of tendon sheath release are reported along with the identification of risk factors correlated with failure of injection. METHODS: A retrospective review of a national healthcare database was conducted identifying patients with a diagnosis of trigger finger or thumb. Inclusion required a tendon sheath injection on the same day or within six weeks of diagnosis. Patient cohorts were further stratified based on treatment success and those requiring additional injections within 6 months or surgery within 1 year of initial diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-one thousand seven hundred fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria and underwent an initial injection within the study period. The efficacy of initial, second, and third injection was 66.3%, 79.4%, and 79.6%, respectively. Of the patients who failed an injection, 9.4% had tendon sheath release after a primary injection, 23.1% had surgery after a second injection, and 30.4% had surgery after a third injection. Only obesity (OR 1.2; P < 0.0001) and concomitant diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (OR 1.4; P < 0.0001) were found to be significant for injection failure on multivariate logistic regression analysis. DISCUSSION: Overall corticosteroid injections were effective in greater than 65% of patients. This information may help guide treatment practice because there seems to be continued additional benefit to repeat corticosteroid injections after injection failure.